AAVAS FINANCIERS LIMITED vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN, — CW/1307/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Jan-2026

CNR: RJHC020046752026

Filing Number

CW/2523/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

CW/1307/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Anuroop Singhi

Coram

Anuroop Singhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters relating to Bank Loans and Transactions ( 3100 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AAVAS FINANCIERS LIMITED

    Adv. JITENDRA CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN,

  2. 2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (DCP) FOR WESTERN JAIPUR METROPOLITAN,

    Adv. Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

  4. 4.KALYAN SHAY JAT S/O CHHITAR MAL,

  5. 5.PREM DEVI W/O KALYAN NIRMALA SAINI W/O ROHITASH KUMAR SAINI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the civil writ petition filed by Aavas Financiers Limited against the State of Rajasthan and police officials as infructuous. Justice Anuroop Singhi held that the grievance underlying the petition no longer survived due to passage of time, rendering the petition without any practical effect and thus dismissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/1307/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the civil writ petition filed by Aavas Financiers Limited against the State of Rajasthan and police officials as infructuous. Justice Anuroop Singhi held that the grievance underlying the petition no longer survived due to passage of time, rendering the petition without any practical effect and thus dismissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case