PAPPURAM SIWAR S/O BHAGWANARAM vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/276/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Jan-2026

CNR: RJHC020013372026

e-Filing Number

05-01-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/655/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/276/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Judge

Ashutosh Kumar

Coram

Ashutosh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAPPURAM SIWAR S/O BHAGWANARAM

    Adv. SHYAM BIHARI GAUTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Ashutosh KumarView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to accused Pappuram Siwar in an NDPS case, holding that since no contraband was recovered from him, he was implicated solely on a co-accused's statement, and he had already been incarcerated since July 2025 with prolonged trial proceedings ahead. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, with a condition to appear before the trial court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 24-Jan-2026

    Ashutosh KumarView PDF

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Ashutosh KumarView PDF

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to accused Pappuram Siwar in an NDPS case, holding that since no contraband was recovered from him, he was implicated solely on a co-accused's statement, and he had already been incarcerated since July 2025 with prolonged trial proceedings ahead. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, with a condition to appear before the trial court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case