BABU LAL CHOUDHARY vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - MAHAVEER PRASAD PAREEK — CW/21866/2024

Case under The Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: RJHC011019342024

Filing Number

CW/56243/2024

Filing Date

20-Dec-2024

Registration No

CW/21866/2024

Registration Date

21-Dec-2024

Judge

Arun Monga

Coram

Arun Monga

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters relating to retiral benefits ( 509 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE - PENSION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABU LAL CHOUDHARY

    Adv. VIPIN MAKKAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - MAHAVEER PRASAD PAREEK

  2. 2.DIRECTOR

  3. 3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,(SECONDARY)

  4. 4.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER , (ELEMENTARY)

  5. 5.DIRECTOR

  6. 6.DEPUTY DIRECTOR

  7. 7.PANCHAYAT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Arun Monga

  3. 22-Jan-2025

    Dinesh MehtaView PDF

    Case Summary: CW/21866/2024 Justice Dinesh Mehta issued a preliminary order on 22/01/2025 in this civil writ petition filed by Babu Lal Choudhary against Rajasthan's Education and Pension departments. The court issued notice to all respondents with a six-week returnable date and rejected the petitioner's stay application, finding no case for granting interim relief. The petition remains pending for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/21866/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CW/21866/2024 Justice Dinesh Mehta issued a preliminary order on 22/01/2025 in this civil writ petition filed by Babu Lal Choudhary against Rajasthan's Education and Pension departments. The court issued notice to all respondents with a six-week returnable date and rejected the petitioner's stay application, finding no case for granting interim relief. The petition remains pending for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case