SMT. URMILA DEVI MAHATMA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - MAHAVEER BISHNOI — CW/17596/2024
Case under Other Acts Section 226. Next hearing: 11th November 2024.
CNR: RJHC010815912024
Filing Number
CW/44856/2024
Filing Date
17-Oct-2024
Registration No
CW/17596/2024
Registration Date
18-Oct-2024
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Indian Stamps Act ( 6700 )
Sub-Category
RAJASTHAN STAMP ACT ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. URMILA DEVI MAHATMA
Adv. AKSHITI SINGHVI
-
2.SMT. NEELAM JAIN
-
3.SMT. TWINKLE PACHORI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - MAHAVEER BISHNOI
-
2.INSPECTOR GENERAL
-
3.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL -CUM-COLLECTOR (STAMPS)
-
4.SUB-REGISTRAR- I
-
5.LALIT DAK
Case History
-
11-Nov-2024
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Kuldeep Mathur
-
12-Mar-2026
Kuldeep Mathur
-
30-Jan-2026
Sunil Beniwal
-
15-Sep-2025
Sunil Beniwal
-
26-Aug-2025
Sunil Beniwal
-
06-Aug-2025
Sunil Beniwal
-
07-Apr-2025
Munnuri Laxman
-
24-Mar-2025
Nupur Bhati
-
23-Oct-2024
Kuldeep MathurView PDF
The High Court of Rajasthan issued notice in a civil writ petition challenging the Sub-Registrar's refusal to register a sale-deed dated 02.08.2024 without additional stamp duty payment. The Court ordered immediate registration of the sale-deed as per notified DLC rates, stayed further proceedings on notices dated 03.08.2024 and 28.08.2024, and directed the petitioner to file an undertaking to deposit any difference amount ultimately found due. The case is returnable on 11.11.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CW/17596/2024
The High Court of Rajasthan issued notice in a civil writ petition challenging the Sub-Registrar's refusal to register a sale-deed dated 02.08.2024 without additional stamp duty payment. The Court ordered immediate registration of the sale-deed as per notified DLC rates, stayed further proceedings on notices dated 03.08.2024 and 28.08.2024, and directed the petitioner to file an undertaking to deposit any difference amount ultimately found due. The case is returnable on 11.11.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts