ARESH VIKRAM SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEEPAK BORA, ,Dr. MILAP CHOPRA,DEEPESH SINGH BENIWAL — CW/16983/2023
Case under The Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
CNR: RJHC010790322023
e-Filing Number
18-10-2023
Filing Number
CW/42923/2023
Filing Date
18-Oct-2023
Registration No
CW/16983/2023
Registration Date
18-Oct-2023
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Other service matters ( 516 )
Sub-Category
SERVICE - SUPERANNUATION AGE ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARESH VIKRAM SINGH
Adv. RISHABH PUROHIT,D.S. GHARSANA,D.S. GHARSANA, D.S. GHARSANA
-
2.SANTAWANA GAUR
Adv. S.K. SHREEMALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEEPAK BORA, ,Dr. MILAP CHOPRA,DEEPESH SINGH BENIWAL
-
2.UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC)
-
3.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
-
4.REGISTRAR
Case History
-
02-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,sandeep Shah
-
21-Jan-2025
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava,nupur BhatiView PDF
Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 16983/2023 before the Rajasthan High Court (Jodhpur), the court condoned the delay in submission of the Pleading File (PF) and notices. The court directed the office to proceed with the case and listed it for hearing after service of notice to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jul-2024
Shree Chandrashekhar,kuldeep MathurView PDF
-
15-Jul-2024
Shree Chandrashekhar,kuldeep MathurView PDF
-
15-Apr-2024
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,munnuri LaxmanView PDF
-
23-Jan-2024
Vijay Bishnoi,rajendra Prakash SoniView PDF
-
02-Dec-2023
Arun Bhansali,rajendra Prakash SoniView PDF
-
19-Oct-2023
Augustine George Masih,vinit Kumar MathurView PDF
-
18-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CW/16983/2023
Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 16983/2023 before the Rajasthan High Court (Jodhpur), the court condoned the delay in submission of the Pleading File (PF) and notices. The court directed the office to proceed with the case and listed it for hearing after service of notice to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts