KEWAL RAM CHAUDHARY vs JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JODHPUR — CW/13766/2024
Case under The Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CNR: RJHC010634312024
e-Filing Number
13-08-2024
Filing Number
CW/34746/2024
Filing Date
16-Aug-2024
Registration No
CW/13766/2024
Registration Date
16-Aug-2024
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
P.I.L. Matters ( 400 )
Sub-Category
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MATTER ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KEWAL RAM CHAUDHARY
Adv. MOTI SINGH,RAMAWTAR SINGH,RAMAWTAR SINGH, ,RAMAWTAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JODHPUR
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ZONE III JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
-
3.DISTRICT COLLECTOR
-
4.TEHSILDAR
-
5.GODHA RAM
-
6.POONAM CHAND
-
7.PRAKASH
-
8.STATION HOUSE OFFICER
-
9.POLICE COMMISSIONER
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Arun Monga,sandeep Shah
-
09-Apr-2026
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,sandeep Shah
-
19-Jan-2026
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,sandeep Shah
-
18-Dec-2025
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,sanjeet Purohit
-
05-Aug-2025
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,sandeep Taneja
-
23-Aug-2024
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava,madan Gopal VyasView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur) in Civil Writ Petition No. 13766/2024 (Kewal Ram Chaudhary v. Jodhpur Development Authority) issued notice to respondents No. 5, 6, and 7 upon payment of court fees within one week, with the case returnable in three weeks. The Court declined to issue notice to respondents No. 8 and 9 at this stage and adjourned the case for listing after service of notice on the other respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CW/13766/2024
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur) in Civil Writ Petition No. 13766/2024 (Kewal Ram Chaudhary v. Jodhpur Development Authority) issued notice to respondents No. 5, 6, and 7 upon payment of court fees within one week, with the case returnable in three weeks. The Court declined to issue notice to respondents No. 8 and 9 at this stage and adjourned the case for listing after service of notice on the other respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts