RAMESH PANWAR vs SMT. BHAGWATI DEVI — CW/13400/2024

Case under Other Acts Section 226. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.

Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: RJHC010614342024

Filing Number

CW/33680/2024

Filing Date

08-Aug-2024

Registration No

CW/13400/2024

Registration Date

08-Aug-2024

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB Writ Pet. which are not covered under any of the above SUB.Category ( 4300 )

Sub-Category

CPC - SECTION 151 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH PANWAR

    Adv. SAJJAN SINGH RAJPUROHIT,BHARAT RAJPUROHIT,BHARAT RAJPUROHIT, ,MANISH BHUNWAL,RAJAT RAJPUROHIT,BHARAT RAJPUROHIT

  2. 2.SATISH PANWAR

  3. 3.SURESH PANWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. BHAGWATI DEVI

  2. 2.SHER SINGH

    Adv. MANISH PATEL,BABU LAL KUDAN DALPAT SINGH

  3. 3.BALVEER

  4. 4.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION JODHPUR (RAJ.)

Case History

  1. 14-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Sudesh Bansal

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Mukesh Rajpurohit

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Mukesh Rajpurohit

  5. 07-Mar-2025

    Nupur Bhati

  6. 19-Sep-2024

    Dinesh MehtaView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 13400/2024 before the High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur), Justice Dinesh Mehta issued notice to the respondents (Smt. Bhagwati Devi & others) returnable on 10th October 2024. The case has been adjourned for further hearing, with notices to be served in two sets, one given to the petitioner's counsel for service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 23-Aug-2024

    Dinesh MehtaView PDF

  8. 08-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/13400/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 13400/2024 before the High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur), Justice Dinesh Mehta issued notice to the respondents (Smt. Bhagwati Devi & others) returnable on 10th October 2024. The case has been adjourned for further hearing, with notices to be served in two sets, one given to the petitioner's counsel for service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case