PARMESHWAR LAL SWAMI vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMP/5302/2024

Case under Other Acts Section 482. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC010586072024

Filing Number

CRLMP/26411/2024

Filing Date

30-Jul-2024

Registration No

CRLMP/5302/2024

Registration Date

03-Aug-2024

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. ( 204 )

Sub-Category

CR.MISC.PETITION - QUASHING THE FIR - ACB/PC ACT ( 59 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMESHWAR LAL SWAMI

    Adv. HARI SHANKER SHRIMALI

  2. 2.SARLA DEVI

  3. 3.ARYA ATUL ANAND SWAMI

  4. 4.RENU SWAMI

  5. 5.KAUSHALYA AKA DIVYA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.JAGDISH

    Adv. DR. KSHAMENDRA MATHUR

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Baljinder Singh Sandhu

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Baljinder Singh Sandhu

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Baljinder Singh Sandhu

  5. 08-Aug-2024

    Arun MongaView PDF

    Summary: The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur issued an interim order in a criminal petition filed by five petitioners against an FIR allegedly filed by Jagdish, whom petitioners claim operates as a land mafia extorting money from land purchasers. The court granted protection from coercive action, directing that no arrests or coercive steps be taken against the petitioners, though they must cooperate with investigation when summoned. Notices were issued to respondents and the Public Prosecutor was granted time to file a status report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 30-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMP/5302/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur issued an interim order in a criminal petition filed by five petitioners against an FIR allegedly filed by Jagdish, whom petitioners claim operates as a land mafia extorting money from land purchasers. The court granted protection from coercive action, directing that no arrests or coercive steps be taken against the petitioners, though they must cooperate with investigation when summoned. Notices were issued to respondents and the Public Prosecutor was granted time to file a status report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case