SURENDRA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMP/4357/2024

Case under Other Acts Section 528. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC010499822024

Filing Number

CRLMP/22389/2024

Filing Date

03-Jul-2024

Registration No

CRLMP/4357/2024

Registration Date

05-Jul-2024

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. ( 204 )

Sub-Category

CR.MISC.PETITION - QUASHING THE FIR - ARMS ACT ( 58 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA

    Adv. ASHOK BISHNOI

  2. 2.PREM SUKH

  3. 3.RAJESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.MAHENDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Baljinder Singh Sandhu

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Sandeep Shah

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Anil Kumar Upman

  5. 10-Jul-2024

    Arun MongaView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur issued an interim order protecting three petitioners (Surendra, Prem Sukh, and Rajesh) from coercive action in FIR No. 97/2024 involving charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 323, 342, 395, and the Arms Act, based on a compromise reached between parties. The petitioners must cooperate with investigation when summoned, and the Public Prosecutor was directed to file a report verifying the compromise before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 03-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMP/4357/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur issued an interim order protecting three petitioners (Surendra, Prem Sukh, and Rajesh) from coercive action in FIR No. 97/2024 involving charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 323, 342, 395, and the Arms Act, based on a compromise reached between parties. The petitioners must cooperate with investigation when summoned, and the Public Prosecutor was directed to file a report verifying the compromise before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case