ABDULLAH KHALID vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR — CW/9167/2024

Case under Indian Statistical Institute Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: RJHC010409402024

e-Filing Number

23-05-2024

Filing Number

CW/23076/2024

Filing Date

23-May-2024

Registration No

CW/9167/2024

Registration Date

23-May-2024

Judge

Kuldeep Mathur

Coram

Kuldeep Mathur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB Writ Pet. which are not covered under any of the above SUB.Category ( 4300 )

Sub-Category

OTHER MISC WRIT OTHER THAN ABOVE ( 68 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Statistical Institute Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDULLAH KHALID

    Adv. SALMAN AGHA,ZEYAUL HAQUE,ZEYAUL HAQUE, ,SALMAN AGHA,HAIDER A,ZEYAUL HAQUE

  2. 2.Nisar Ahmed Khilji

    Adv. SALMAN AGHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

  2. 2.SHRI MAHAVEER SINGH JODHA (RAS)

  3. 3.SHRI SHAKIL PARVEZ

  4. 4.SETH NOOR MOHAMMED

  5. 5.DR. GULAB RABBANI

  6. 6.HAARUN KHAN

  7. 7.SHOKAT ALI ANSARI

  8. 8.MOHAMMED ISMAIL QURESHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Kuldeep Mathur

  3. 08-Sep-2025

    Sunil Beniwal

  4. 20-Aug-2025

    Sunil Beniwal

  5. 14-Aug-2025

    Sunil Beniwal

  6. 24-Mar-2025

    Nupur Bhati

  7. 24-Feb-2025

    Nupur Bhati

  8. 29-May-2024

    Nupur BhatiView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court (Jodhpur) found that Civil Writ Petition No. 9167/2024 was incorrectly listed before the current bench according to the court roster. The court directed the registry to reassign the matter to the appropriate bench for proper hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 23-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/9167/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court (Jodhpur) found that Civil Writ Petition No. 9167/2024 was incorrectly listed before the current bench according to the court roster. The court directed the registry to reassign the matter to the appropriate bench for proper hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case