HDFC ERGO GEN. INS. COMP. LTD. JODHPUR JAGDISH VYAS, LALIT VYAS vs SANWAR RAM AND ORS. — CMA/2433/2016

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: RJHC010319292016

Filing Number

CMA/7783/2016

Filing Date

13-Oct-2016

Registration No

CMA/2433/2016

Registration Date

17-Oct-2016

Judge

Mukesh Rajpurohit

Coram

Mukesh Rajpurohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Fatal injury, permanent disability matters ( 603 )

Sub-Category

P.D./DEATH OTHER THAN MACT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC ERGO GEN. INS. COMP. LTD. JODHPUR JAGDISH VYAS, LALIT VYAS

  2. 2.HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANWAR RAM AND ORS.

    Adv. PRADEEP CHOUDHARY 1123

  2. 2.Sanwar Ram S/o Shri Madhu Ram Jat,

  3. 3.Om Prakash S/o Sh. Kana Ram Jat Driver

    Adv. PRADEEP CHOUDHARY

  4. 4.Asha Ram S/o Shri Amra Ram Jat, Owner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Aug-2026

    For Hearing - Early Hear. Matters

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Mukesh Rajpurohit

  4. 04-Jul-2024

    Nupur BhatiView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court admitted the cross objection filed by Sanwar Ram against HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company and others. The court dispensed with service of notice on respondents 2 and 3 at the petitioner's counsel's risk and cost, and listed the cross objection together with the related civil misc. appeal for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 20-Feb-2017

    Mahendra MaheshwariView PDF

  6. 13-Oct-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/2433/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court admitted the cross objection filed by Sanwar Ram against HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company and others. The court dispensed with service of notice on respondents 2 and 3 at the petitioner's counsel's risk and cost, and listed the cross objection together with the related civil misc. appeal for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case