IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. vs BIHARI LAL SUHALKA Advocate - RADHE SHYAM MANKAD — CMA/1592/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1988 Section 173. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Next hearing 15-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC010267612024

Filing Number

CMA/15104/2024

Filing Date

05-Apr-2024

Registration No

CMA/1592/2024

Registration Date

14-May-2024

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Fatal injury, permanent disability matters ( 603 )

Sub-Category

DEATH CASES WHERE DECEASED WAS NON GOVERNMENT SERVANT- MARRIED ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

    Adv. JAGDISH CHANDRA VYAS,DEEPAK VYAS,DEEPAK VYAS, ,DEEPAK VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIHARI LAL SUHALKA Advocate - RADHE SHYAM MANKAD

  2. 2.ANKUSH

    Adv. MITHALESH MANKAD

  3. 3.TUSHAR

  4. 4.JEEVAN DAN VAIRAGI

    Adv. TUSHAR MOAD,ARPIT SUKHWAL

  5. 5.RAM DAS VAISHNAV

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Mukesh Rajpurohit

  3. 06-Aug-2024

    Madan Gopal VyasView PDF

    Summary: In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1592/2024 before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jodhpur, the case between Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. (appellant) and Bihari Lal Suhalka (respondent) was adjourned. The court confirmed that service was complete and listed the matter for hearing after four weeks, with any existing interim orders continuing until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-May-2024

    Madan Gopal VyasView PDF

  5. 05-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/1592/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1592/2024 before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jodhpur, the case between Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. (appellant) and Bihari Lal Suhalka (respondent) was adjourned. The court confirmed that service was complete and listed the matter for hearing after four weeks, with any existing interim orders continuing until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case