BALRAM vs BRAJLAL Advocate - KIRTI PAREEK, ,NIRANJAN LAL JOSHI,NARESH TAK — CRLMP/1549/2022
Case under Other Acts Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 09th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC010190672022
Filing Number
CRLMP/7903/2022
Filing Date
22-Mar-2022
Registration No
CRLMP/1549/2022
Registration Date
23-Mar-2022
Judge
Anil Kumar Upman
Coram
Anil Kumar Upman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. ( 204 )
Sub-Category
CR.MISC.PETITION - OTHERS ( 82 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALRAM
Adv. KR SAHARAN,CR CHOUDHARY,CR CHOUDHARY, ,CR CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.BRAJLAL Advocate - KIRTI PAREEK, ,NIRANJAN LAL JOSHI,NARESH TAK
-
2.AASHU SINGH SHEKHAWAT
-
3.LAL CHAND BAJOLIYA
-
4.LEKHARAM BARAIJ
Adv. RAMAWATAR SINGH,JASSA RAM JAI KISHAN SUMER SINGH GOUR
-
5.ASHOK KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Anil Kumar Upman
-
12-Jan-2023
Pushpendra Singh BhatiView PDF
The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur permitted the petitioner Balram to proceed with his criminal petition without serving some respondents, allowing service at his own risk and cost. The court adjourned the case for two weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2022
Pushpendra Singh BhatiView PDF
-
22-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMP/1549/2022
The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur permitted the petitioner Balram to proceed with his criminal petition without serving some respondents, allowing service at his own risk and cost. The court adjourned the case for two weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts