M/S MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR — ARBAP/5/2024
Case under Other Acts Section 11. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: RJHC010117172024
e-Filing Number
13-02-2024
Filing Number
ARBAP/6209/2024
Filing Date
14-Feb-2024
Registration No
ARBAP/5/2024
Registration Date
15-Feb-2024
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Arbitration Matters ( 1200 )
Sub-Category
ARBITRATION APPLICATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION
Adv. SAJJAN SINGH RAJPUROHIT,ALKA PANDEY,ALKA PANDEY, SURBHI,MANISH BHUNWAL,RAJAT RAJPUROHIT,ALKA PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
Adv. MADHUSUDAN RAJPUROHIT 1123
-
2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
-
3.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Mukesh Rajpurohit
-
27-Mar-2026
Mukesh Rajpurohit
-
05-Mar-2026
Mukesh Rajpurohit
-
15-Apr-2025
Arun Monga
-
27-Feb-2025
Rekha Borana
-
24-Feb-2025
Manoj Kumar Garg
-
19-Nov-2024
Rekha BoranaView PDF
Case Status Summary: In S.B. Arbitration Application No. 5/2024 before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan (Jodhpur), the court adjourned the matter to 28.11.2024. The respondents did not appear, but the petitioner's counsel confirmed receipt of their reply. The court directed that the respondents' reply be tagged with the application for further consideration at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2024
Rekha BoranaView PDF
-
01-Oct-2024
Nupur BhatiView PDF
-
23-Sep-2024
Nupur BhatiView PDF
-
29-Jul-2024
Nupur BhatiView PDF
-
12-Jul-2024
Nupur BhatiView PDF
-
22-May-2024
Madan Gopal VyasView PDF
-
06-May-2024
Rekha BoranaView PDF
-
01-Mar-2024
Madan Gopal VyasView PDF
-
14-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. ARBAP/5/2024
Case Status Summary: In S.B. Arbitration Application No. 5/2024 before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan (Jodhpur), the court adjourned the matter to 28.11.2024. The respondents did not appear, but the petitioner's counsel confirmed receipt of their reply. The court directed that the respondents' reply be tagged with the application for further consideration at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts