FATEH KANWAR MOTI SINGH, URJA RAM,BS TAPU vs STATE and ORS. — SAW/308/2017
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC010081942017
Filing Number
SAW/11710/2017
Filing Date
27-Mar-2017
Registration No
SAW/308/2017
Registration Date
13-Apr-2017
Judge
Pushpendra Singh Bhati , Sandeep Shah
Coram
Pushpendra Singh Bhati , Sandeep Shah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Rajasthan Panchayat Act ( 5200 )
Sub-Category
CANCELLATION/ALLOWING OF PATTA ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FATEH KANWAR MOTI SINGH, URJA RAM,BS TAPU
-
2.Fateh Kanwar W/o Heer Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE and ORS.
-
2.State of Rajasthan Through Secretary,
-
3.Addl. Distt. Collector II
-
4.Gram Panchayat Bavdi, Through Its Sarpanch,
-
5.Smt. Anand Kanwar W/o Bhagwan Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,sandeep Shah
-
08-Jan-2026
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,sandeep Shah
-
03-Dec-2024
Pushpendra Singh Bhati,munnuri LaxmanView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur issued an interim order dated December 3, 2024, in the writ petition filed by Om Singh against the State of Rajasthan. The court adjourned the matter for four weeks, with neither the appellant nor the respondent present at the hearing. No substantive decision on merits was delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jan-2023
Arun Bhansali,ashok Kumar JainView PDF
-
03-Oct-2017
Govind Mathur,vinit Kumar MathurView PDF
-
18-Jul-2017
Govind Mathur,vinit Kumar MathurView PDF
-
09-May-2017
Pradeep Nandrajog,pushpendra Singh BhatiView PDF
-
19-Apr-2017
Govind Mathur,vinit Kumar MathurView PDF
-
27-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. SAW/308/2017
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur issued an interim order dated December 3, 2024, in the writ petition filed by Om Singh against the State of Rajasthan. The court adjourned the matter for four weeks, with neither the appellant nor the respondent present at the hearing. No substantive decision on merits was delivered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts