SMT. SAYARA KHAN vs JAGDISH CHANDRA PRAJAPAT — CMA/804/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1988 Section 173. Next hearing: 09th May 2026.

Next hearing 09-May-2026

CNR: RJHC010000762024

Filing Number

CMA/61/2024

Filing Date

02-Jan-2024

Registration No

CMA/804/2024

Registration Date

12-Mar-2024

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Fatal injury, permanent disability matters ( 603 )

Sub-Category

DEATH CASES WHERE DECEASED WAS NON GOVERNMENT SERVANT- MARRIED ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SAYARA KHAN

    Adv. RAGHUVEER SINGH BHATI

  2. 2.MINOR MOHD. SAHIL

  3. 3.MINOR MST. JOYA KHAN

  4. 4.FAKIR MOHD

  5. 5.SMT. FARUK B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISH CHANDRA PRAJAPAT

  2. 2.BRANCH MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. 09-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Mukesh Rajpurohit

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Mukesh Rajpurohit

  4. 10-Jan-2025

    Rekha BoranaView PDF

    Summary In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 804/2024 before the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, the Court allowed the appellants' application dispensing with the filing of a certified copy of the impugned judgment/award dated 08.09.2023, as it was already filed in a related appeal. The appellants were permitted to cure defect No.2 in Court itself, while the office was directed to verify and proceed regarding defect No.3, for which the power of attorney has been filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/804/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 804/2024 before the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, the Court allowed the appellants' application dispensing with the filing of a certified copy of the impugned judgment/award dated 08.09.2023, as it was already filed in a related appeal. The appellants were permitted to cure defect No.2 in Court itself, while the office was directed to verify and proceed regarding defect No.3, for which the power of attorney has been filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case