RAVI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/57/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Jan-2026

CNR: PHHC012131492025

Filing Number

CRM-M/110819/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/57/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI

    Adv. VISHAL GARG NARWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/57/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Ravi on May 12, 2026, in a cheating case (FIR No. 226) involving alleged fraud of Rs. 80 lakhs by the Star Global Star company. The court found that after nearly 6.5 years in custody since October 2019, with only 17 of 46 prosecution witnesses examined and investigation still pending, continued detention served no meaningful purpose. The court ordered release on heavy bail/two surety bonds, noting that allegations remain unproven and a co-accused similarly situated had been released after 3.75 years, while imposing conditions against witness intimidation and similar future conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/57/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/57/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Ravi on May 12, 2026, in a cheating case (FIR No. 226) involving alleged fraud of Rs. 80 lakhs by the Star Global Star company. The court found that after nearly 6.5 years in custody since October 2019, with only 17 of 46 prosecution witnesses examined and investigation still pending, continued detention served no meaningful purpose. The court ordered release on heavy bail/two surety bonds, noting that allegations remain unproven and a co-accused similarly situated had been released after 3.75 years, while imposing conditions against witness intimidation and similar future conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case