RAKESH ALIAS RAKESH KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/146/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC012127912025
Next Hearing
14th January 2026
Filing Number
CRM-M/110615/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
CRM-M/146/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Judge
MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Coram
MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Petitioner(s)
RAKESH ALIAS RAKESH KUMAR
Adv. KESHAV PRATAP SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF HARYANA
Orders
Case Summary: CRM-M/146/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Rakesh Kumar, accused in a murder case (FIR No.45) where he was charged with causing disappearance of evidence under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 238(a) of BNS, 2023. The petitioner was not named in the original FIR but implicated during investigation through co-accused disclosure statements alleging he provided plastic bags to conceal the victim's body. The court found his role was subsequent to the murder with no prior involvement, investigation was complete with challan filed, and prolonged custody served no useful purpose since no prosecution witness had been examined. Bail was granted subject to furnishing surety bonds and conditions to attend trial regularly and not tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM-M/146/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Rakesh Kumar, accused in a murder case (FIR No.45) where he was charged with causing disappearance of evidence under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 238(a) of BNS, 2023. The petitioner was not named in the original FIR but implicated during investigation through co-accused disclosure statements alleging he provided plastic bags to conceal the victim's body. The court found his role was subsequent to the murder with no prior involvement, investigation was complete with challan filed, and prolonged custody served no useful purpose since no prosecution witness had been examined. Bail was granted subject to furnishing surety bonds and conditions to attend trial regularly and not tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts