RISHABH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRA-S/86/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Jan-2026

CNR: PHHC012116632025

Filing Number

CRA-S/110077/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRA-S/86/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

36.48-CRIMINAL APPEALS U/S 14A UNDER SC/ST ACT,1989 SEEKING REGULAR BAILS-GENERAL ( 1427 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RISHABH

    Adv. RAJAT SHEOKAND

  2. 2.RISHABH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.RAJPAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA-S/86/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed appellant Rishabh's bail appeal in a murder case involving caste-based violence. The appellant was accused of participating in the fatal assault of a Scheduled Caste student, where the victim died from knife wounds to the left lung. Though investigation revealed co-accused Harsh inflicted the fatal knife injury, the court found prima facie evidence of the appellant's active participation—kicking the victim while others attacked him—and his intent to cause death. The court held that despite prolonged custody, the serious nature of murder charges under SC/ST Act provisions outweighed bail considerations, dismissing the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA-S/86/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed appellant Rishabh's bail appeal in a murder case involving caste-based violence. The appellant was accused of participating in the fatal assault of a Scheduled Caste student, where the victim died from knife wounds to the left lung. Though investigation revealed co-accused Harsh inflicted the fatal knife injury, the court found prima facie evidence of the appellant's active participation—kicking the victim while others attacked him—and his intent to cause death. The court held that despite prolonged custody, the serious nature of murder charges under SC/ST Act provisions outweighed bail considerations, dismissing the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case