M/S AP EARTHMOVERS AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. — CWP/38903/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Feb-2026

CNR: PHHC012096932025

e-Filing Number

20-12-2025

Filing Number

CWP/82020/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/38903/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.66 - CASE RLT TO REL OF PAY OF WRK DON UND ORD GOVT FUN ( 759 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S AP EARTHMOVERS AND ANR

    Adv. A.P.S. SANDHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Summary: CWP-38903-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by A.P. Earthmovers seeking payment from Municipal Corporation, Amritsar for supplied vehicles and fuel. The court found no direct contract existed between petitioners and the Corporation; they had only supplied materials to the main contractor (Averda Waste Management). The court held that disputed factual questions regarding sub-contracting arrangements and service delivery cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction, directing petitioners to pursue remedies through appropriate legal channels against the contractor instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/38903/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CWP-38903-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by A.P. Earthmovers seeking payment from Municipal Corporation, Amritsar for supplied vehicles and fuel. The court found no direct contract existed between petitioners and the Corporation; they had only supplied materials to the main contractor (Averda Waste Management). The court held that disputed factual questions regarding sub-contracting arrangements and service delivery cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction, directing petitioners to pursue remedies through appropriate legal channels against the contractor instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case