RAHUL vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/73555/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Jan-2026

CNR: PHHC012087842025

Filing Number

CRM-M/108801/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/73555/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL

    Adv. PUNIT MALIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/73555/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed bail petitions filed by Rahul and Ibrahim @ Raju, who were arrested in connection with an NDPS Act case involving 24,000 Tramadol capsules recovered during a police raid in Faridabad. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in an illegal drug distribution business through "Vaishno Pharma," with Rahul having invested approximately Rs. 1.7 lakhs into the enterprise, and denied bail citing the gravity of the offense and quantity recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/73555/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/73555/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed bail petitions filed by Rahul and Ibrahim @ Raju, who were arrested in connection with an NDPS Act case involving 24,000 Tramadol capsules recovered during a police raid in Faridabad. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in an illegal drug distribution business through "Vaishno Pharma," with Rahul having invested approximately Rs. 1.7 lakhs into the enterprise, and denied bail citing the gravity of the offense and quantity recovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case