SANDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/38427/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC012082722025

Filing Number

CWP/81338/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

CWP/38427/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP SINGH

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR DAHIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/38427/2025 - SANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA Sandeep Singh sought court direction to consider his complaints (dated February 2021 and April 2022) alleging that Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) officers violated procurement instructions by increasing contract amounts beyond the 25% permissible limit. The High Court disposed of the petition after the respondent's counsel assured the court that competent authorities would examine the complaints and proceed lawfully if substance is found. The court expressly clarified it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/38427/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/38427/2025 - SANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA Sandeep Singh sought court direction to consider his complaints (dated February 2021 and April 2022) alleging that Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) officers violated procurement instructions by increasing contract amounts beyond the 25% permissible limit. The High Court disposed of the petition after the respondent's counsel assured the court that competent authorities would examine the complaints and proceed lawfully if substance is found. The court expressly clarified it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case