AKSHI NAYYAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER — CWP/38417/2025
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC012080492025
e-Filing Number
17-12-2025
Filing Number
CWP/81214/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
CWP/38417/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Judge
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Coram
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Bench Type
Double
Category
6.37 - PETITIONS UNDER PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT ( 388 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKSHI NAYYAR
Adv. HIMANSHU RAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
The Chief Justice,mr. Justice Sanjiv BerryView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/38417/2025 Akshi Nayyar v. Union of India and Others Homebuyer Akshi Nayyar challenged delayed action on her 2020 fraud complaint against Raheja Developers (Raheja OMA project, Dharuhera) filed with SFIO under Companies Act s.211. The court directed SFIO's Director to reconsider the representation and pass a reasoned decision on whether serious fraud exists; if found, to proceed under s.212 of the Companies Act. The Enforcement Directorate confirmed parallel investigation (ECIR/DL20-II/30/2022) already underway with searches conducted. Petition disposed with SFIO granted discretion to decide either way based on facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/38417/2025
Case Summary: CWP/38417/2025 Akshi Nayyar v. Union of India and Others Homebuyer Akshi Nayyar challenged delayed action on her 2020 fraud complaint against Raheja Developers (Raheja OMA project, Dharuhera) filed with SFIO under Companies Act s.211. The court directed SFIO's Director to reconsider the representation and pass a reasoned decision on whether serious fraud exists; if found, to proceed under s.212 of the Companies Act. The Enforcement Directorate confirmed parallel investigation (ECIR/DL20-II/30/2022) already underway with searches conducted. Petition disposed with SFIO granted discretion to decide either way based on facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts