JAANVI vs JARJ SINGH ALIAS GAGANDEEP SINGH ALIAS GAGAN AND ANOTHER — TA/1698/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Feb-2026

CNR: PHHC012079502025

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

TA/81188/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

TA/1698/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAANVI

    Adv. BHAVESH AGGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JARJ SINGH ALIAS GAGANDEEP SINGH ALIAS GAGAN AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/1698/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed petitioner Jaanvi's transfer application to shift a child custody petition from Jalandhar Family Court to Amritsar. The husband had filed a custody case for their minor son Nilansh at Jalandhar, but the court found sufficient grounds for transfer, including: the child ordinarily resides with the mother at Amritsar; the petitioner lacks income and cannot afford 90 km travel; two related cases (domestic violence complaint and divorce petition) are already pending at Amritsar; and Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act requires custody petitions where the child resides. The case was transferred with parties directed to appear before the District & Sessions Judge, Amritsar on 01.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/1698/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/1698/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed petitioner Jaanvi's transfer application to shift a child custody petition from Jalandhar Family Court to Amritsar. The husband had filed a custody case for their minor son Nilansh at Jalandhar, but the court found sufficient grounds for transfer, including: the child ordinarily resides with the mother at Amritsar; the petitioner lacks income and cannot afford 90 km travel; two related cases (domestic violence complaint and divorce petition) are already pending at Amritsar; and Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act requires custody petitions where the child resides. The case was transferred with parties directed to appear before the District & Sessions Judge, Amritsar on 01.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case