MS V K ENTERPRISES vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — CWP/38520/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Jan-2026

CNR: PHHC012076002025

e-Filing Number

17-12-2025

Filing Number

CWP/81086/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/38520/2025

Registration Date

19-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Bench Type

Double

Category

6.41 - GOODS AND SERVICE TAX WRIT PUNJAB (INDIRECT) ( 391 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS V K ENTERPRISES

    Adv. MOHIT BASSI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal,ms. Justice Lapita BanerjiView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the retrospective cancellation of M/s V.K. Enterprises' GST registration dated 21.07.2025, finding that no show cause notice was served before the cancellation. The court held that quasi-judicial authorities must provide notice of proposed action with reasons and supporting material, citing the settled principle that a show cause notice must contain basic grounds for action sought. Liberty was granted to respondents to proceed afresh in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/38520/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the retrospective cancellation of M/s V.K. Enterprises' GST registration dated 21.07.2025, finding that no show cause notice was served before the cancellation. The court held that quasi-judicial authorities must provide notice of proposed action with reasons and supporting material, citing the settled principle that a show cause notice must contain basic grounds for action sought. Liberty was granted to respondents to proceed afresh in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case