EHC VIJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/37928/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Jan-2026

CNR: PHHC012057092025

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

CWP/80234/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/37928/2025

Registration Date

16-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.35 - SENIORITY DISPUTE OF EMPLOYEES POLICE DEPT HRY ( 725 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EHC VIJAY KUMAR

    Adv. SURINDER SINGH

  2. 2.EHC Vijay kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of haryana and Others

  3. 3.the director genral of police haryana police head quarter sector 6 pachkula

  4. 4.The Superintendent of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of EHC Vijay Kumar's writ petition seeking reconsideration of his inter-se seniority among Haryana Police constables from 2008 onwards. Without examining the merits, the court directed respondent No.2 (Director General of Police, Haryana) to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 01.11.2025 within three months from receipt of the certified order, in accordance with law. The state did not oppose the prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/37928/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of EHC Vijay Kumar's writ petition seeking reconsideration of his inter-se seniority among Haryana Police constables from 2008 onwards. Without examining the merits, the court directed respondent No.2 (Director General of Police, Haryana) to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 01.11.2025 within three months from receipt of the certified order, in accordance with law. The state did not oppose the prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case