SARABJIT SINGH ALIAS SABA ALIAS SHABA SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/72219/2025
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC012049912025
Filing Number
CRM-M/106950/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
CRM-M/72219/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Judge
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Coram
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARABJIT SINGH ALIAS SABA ALIAS SHABA SINGH
Adv. L M GULATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M/72219/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Sarabjit Singh, arrested in connection with FIR No. 0244 registered under BNS Sections 333, 326(g), 115(2), 324(4), 324(5), 191(3), and 190, involving allegations of unlawful assembly, property trespass, and assault at Ajnala Police Station. Although named in the FIR, no specific overt act was attributed to him, no medical evidence of injuries was produced, no recovery was effected, and investigation concluded without bail being necessary for further investigation. Justice Manisha Batra held that pre-trial custody cannot serve as post-conviction punishment and must only secure trial attendance; considering the nature of allegations, attributed role, and case circumstances, bail was warranted. Petitioner was ordered released on personal and surety bonds with conditions that any fresh FIR could trigger bail cancellation application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/72219/2025
Case Summary: CRM-M/72219/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Sarabjit Singh, arrested in connection with FIR No. 0244 registered under BNS Sections 333, 326(g), 115(2), 324(4), 324(5), 191(3), and 190, involving allegations of unlawful assembly, property trespass, and assault at Ajnala Police Station. Although named in the FIR, no specific overt act was attributed to him, no medical evidence of injuries was produced, no recovery was effected, and investigation concluded without bail being necessary for further investigation. Justice Manisha Batra held that pre-trial custody cannot serve as post-conviction punishment and must only secure trial attendance; considering the nature of allegations, attributed role, and case circumstances, bail was warranted. Petitioner was ordered released on personal and surety bonds with conditions that any fresh FIR could trigger bail cancellation application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts