MUKUL @ BAWA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/70019/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC012006722025

Filing Number

CRM-M/104592/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/70019/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKUL @ BAWA

    Adv. KRISHAN SINGH

  2. 2.MUKUL @ BAWA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Mukul @ Bawa in a murder case (FIR No.4, Sections 302, 120B, 201, 34 IPC) after he spent 2 years, 9 months, and 27 days in custody. The court found that co-accused were granted bail after shorter periods, charges were framed over two years ago with only 11 of 34 witnesses examined, and further incarceration would violate Article 21 rights given the trial's lengthy continuation. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/70019/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Mukul @ Bawa in a murder case (FIR No.4, Sections 302, 120B, 201, 34 IPC) after he spent 2 years, 9 months, and 27 days in custody. The court found that co-accused were granted bail after shorter periods, charges were framed over two years ago with only 11 of 34 witnesses examined, and further incarceration would violate Article 21 rights given the trial's lengthy continuation. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case