MANDEEP AND ANOTHER vs THE TRADE UNION U T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS — CWP/37280/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Civil Writ Petition Under Article 2. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC012003842025
e-Filing Number
08-12-2025
Filing Number
CWP/78224/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
CWP/37280/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Coram
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.65 - CASE REL TO ELE OF SOCI RUN SCH,COL,UNI & PVT ORG ( 758 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANDEEP AND ANOTHER
Adv. ROHIT SHARMA
-
2.Mandeep and Another
-
3.Vijay Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TRADE UNION U T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
-
2.The Trade Union U T Chandigarh and others
-
3.Mr Ajay Kumar chief Returning officer
-
4.Shri Atul Bansal returning officer
-
5.Baldev Chhabra President
-
6.Sachin Katiyar General Secretary
-
7.Shri Manjinder
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF
Case Summary: CWP-37280-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Mandeep and another, members of the Indian Bank Officers Association, who challenged the election result declared on 08.09.2025. The petitioners' nominations were rejected for being filed after the stipulated deadline, and they sought to set aside the election result despite serving a legal notice. The court found the dispute to be primarily between private parties with the election already concluded, and allowed the petitioners to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/37280/2025
Case Summary: CWP-37280-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Mandeep and another, members of the Indian Bank Officers Association, who challenged the election result declared on 08.09.2025. The petitioners' nominations were rejected for being filed after the stipulated deadline, and they sought to set aside the election result despite serving a legal notice. The court found the dispute to be primarily between private parties with the election already concluded, and allowed the petitioners to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts