JAGJIT SINGH @ JEETA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRA-S/3841/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011998242025

Filing Number

CRA-S/104223/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRA-S/3841/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

36.48-CRIMINAL APPEALS U/S 14A UNDER SC/ST ACT,1989 SEEKING REGULAR BAILS-GENERAL ( 1424 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGJIT SINGH @ JEETA

    Adv. VARUN GOYAL

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.TARSEM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted absolute anticipatory bail to Jagjit Singh @ Jeeta in connection with FIR No. 44 (2021) involving charges under IPC Sections 506, 509, and the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, for allegedly posting offensive Facebook content. The court found no substantial justification for custodial interrogation, noting the appellant had already appeared before the trial court on 17.12.2025 as directed and complied with previous court orders. The appellant must continue appearing before the trial court as required and abide by bail conditions under BNSS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/3841/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted absolute anticipatory bail to Jagjit Singh @ Jeeta in connection with FIR No. 44 (2021) involving charges under IPC Sections 506, 509, and the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, for allegedly posting offensive Facebook content. The court found no substantial justification for custodial interrogation, noting the appellant had already appeared before the trial court on 17.12.2025 as directed and complied with previous court orders. The appellant must continue appearing before the trial court as required and abide by bail conditions under BNSS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case