DALJIT SINGH ALIAS PAPPUS vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/69020/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011982452025

Filing Number

CRM-M/103411/2025

Filing Date

04-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/69020/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DALJIT SINGH ALIAS PAPPUS

    Adv. SUKHBIR MAANDI

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-69020-2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Daljit Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a fraud case involving alleged duping of Rs. 7.5 lakh under the pretext of sending the complainant's son abroad. The court found that Rs. 5 lakh was credited to the petitioner's account, and though he claimed Rs. 2.5 lakh was refunded, this could not be verified without complainant's acceptance. The court held the petitioner was not entitled to extraordinary relief on equity grounds but granted liberty to file a fresh petition if the full amount is repaid to the complainant's satisfaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/69020/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-69020-2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Daljit Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a fraud case involving alleged duping of Rs. 7.5 lakh under the pretext of sending the complainant's son abroad. The court found that Rs. 5 lakh was credited to the petitioner's account, and though he claimed Rs. 2.5 lakh was refunded, this could not be verified without complainant's acceptance. The court held the petitioner was not entitled to extraordinary relief on equity grounds but granted liberty to file a fresh petition if the full amount is repaid to the complainant's satisfaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case