JASWINDER KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/70364/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011977522025

Filing Number

CRM-M/103146/2025

Filing Date

04-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/70364/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASWINDER KAUR

    Adv. P.K.S. PHOOLKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/70364/2025 Jaswinder Kaur was accused of fetching a licensed 12-bore rifle and handing it to her son Jagtar Singh, who fired it during a matrimonial dispute, killing Sukhbir Kaur and injuring two others. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted Jaswinder Kaur bail, considering her 53 years of age, clean criminal record, nearly 1.5 years of custody already served, early trial stage (only 5 of 31 prosecution witnesses examined), and the improbability of her direct involvement. The court imposed conditions that she not threaten or influence prosecution witnesses, while clarifying the bail decision expressed no opinion on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/70364/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/70364/2025 Jaswinder Kaur was accused of fetching a licensed 12-bore rifle and handing it to her son Jagtar Singh, who fired it during a matrimonial dispute, killing Sukhbir Kaur and injuring two others. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted Jaswinder Kaur bail, considering her 53 years of age, clean criminal record, nearly 1.5 years of custody already served, early trial stage (only 5 of 31 prosecution witnesses examined), and the improbability of her direct involvement. The court imposed conditions that she not threaten or influence prosecution witnesses, while clarifying the bail decision expressed no opinion on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case