SUKHRAJ SINGH ALIAS SUKH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/69076/2025
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC011977032025
Filing Number
CRM-M/103116/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
CRM-M/69076/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth
Coram
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKHRAJ SINGH ALIAS SUKH
Adv. DEEPAK ARORA
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-69076-2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Sukhraj Singh's anticipatory bail petition (dated 24.03.2026) after he withdrew it with liberty to refile. Singh faced charges under BNS sections 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 191(3), and 190 for allegedly striking his brother-in-law Harpinder Singh with a dattar during a matrimonial dispute on 26.09.2025, causing grievous injury. The Court granted the withdrawal after learning that compromise talks were underway between the parties, allowing Singh to file a fresh petition once the family dispute was amicably resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/69076/2025
Case Summary: CRM-M-69076-2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Sukhraj Singh's anticipatory bail petition (dated 24.03.2026) after he withdrew it with liberty to refile. Singh faced charges under BNS sections 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 191(3), and 190 for allegedly striking his brother-in-law Harpinder Singh with a dattar during a matrimonial dispute on 26.09.2025, causing grievous injury. The Court granted the withdrawal after learning that compromise talks were underway between the parties, allowing Singh to file a fresh petition once the family dispute was amicably resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts