UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs DARSHANA RANI & ORS. — CWP/36167/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226 AND 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC011958692025
Next Hearing
05th February 2026
Filing Number
CWP/76503/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
CWP/36167/2025
Registration Date
02-12-2025
Judge
MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Coram
MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.61 - CASES AGNST ORD OF PLA REG DIS WITH INSU COMPANIES ( 754 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. Nitin Gupta
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Respondent(s)
DARSHANA RANI & ORS.
DARSHANA RANI
MD India Health Insurance TPA PVT LTD
DIRECTOR BHAGAT PURAN SINGH SEHAT SEWA BIMA YOJNA
THE CHAIRMAN PERMANENT LOK ADALAT PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
Orders
Case Summary: CWP-36167-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed United India Insurance Company's petition challenging a Permanent Lok Adalat award that granted ₹5 lakh insurance claim to Darshana Rani under the Bhagat Puran Singh Sehat Bima Yojana. The insurer had rejected the claim citing a name mismatch—the health card bore "Harmej Singh" while the claimant's husband was "Mahinder Singh"—but the Lok Adalat found this was a clerical/typographical error, as all other card details (father's name, village, photograph) matched the deceased. The court upheld the award, noting the petitioner failed to prove any "Harmej Singh" existed, adverse inference arose from non-production of enrollment records, and Section 22E of the Legal Services Authority Act makes Lok Adalat awards final unless there is manifest procedural error or jurisdictional excess—neither present here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CWP-36167-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed United India Insurance Company's petition challenging a Permanent Lok Adalat award that granted ₹5 lakh insurance claim to Darshana Rani under the Bhagat Puran Singh Sehat Bima Yojana. The insurer had rejected the claim citing a name mismatch—the health card bore "Harmej Singh" while the claimant's husband was "Mahinder Singh"—but the Lok Adalat found this was a clerical/typographical error, as all other card details (father's name, village, photograph) matched the deceased. The court upheld the award, noting the petitioner failed to prove any "Harmej Singh" existed, adverse inference arose from non-production of enrollment records, and Section 22E of the Legal Services Authority Act makes Lok Adalat awards final unless there is manifest procedural error or jurisdictional excess—neither present here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts