UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs DARSHANA RANI & ORS. — CWP/36167/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226 AND 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 21st April 2026.

CNR: PHHC011958692025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

05th February 2026

Filing Number

CWP/76503/2025

Filing Date

17-11-2025

Registration No

CWP/36167/2025

Registration Date

02-12-2025

Judge

MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.61 - CASES AGNST ORD OF PLA REG DIS WITH INSU COMPANIES ( 754 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Adv. Nitin Gupta

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Respondent(s)

DARSHANA RANI & ORS.

DARSHANA RANI

MD India Health Insurance TPA PVT LTD

DIRECTOR BHAGAT PURAN SINGH SEHAT SEWA BIMA YOJNA

THE CHAIRMAN PERMANENT LOK ADALAT PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES

Orders

21-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Case Summary: CWP-36167-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed United India Insurance Company's petition challenging a Permanent Lok Adalat award that granted ₹5 lakh insurance claim to Darshana Rani under the Bhagat Puran Singh Sehat Bima Yojana. The insurer had rejected the claim citing a name mismatch—the health card bore "Harmej Singh" while the claimant's husband was "Mahinder Singh"—but the Lok Adalat found this was a clerical/typographical error, as all other card details (father's name, village, photograph) matched the deceased. The court upheld the award, noting the petitioner failed to prove any "Harmej Singh" existed, adverse inference arose from non-production of enrollment records, and Section 22E of the Legal Services Authority Act makes Lok Adalat awards final unless there is manifest procedural error or jurisdictional excess—neither present here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-36167-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed United India Insurance Company's petition challenging a Permanent Lok Adalat award that granted ₹5 lakh insurance claim to Darshana Rani under the Bhagat Puran Singh Sehat Bima Yojana. The insurer had rejected the claim citing a name mismatch—the health card bore "Harmej Singh" while the claimant's husband was "Mahinder Singh"—but the Lok Adalat found this was a clerical/typographical error, as all other card details (father's name, village, photograph) matched the deceased. The court upheld the award, noting the petitioner failed to prove any "Harmej Singh" existed, adverse inference arose from non-production of enrollment records, and Section 22E of the Legal Services Authority Act makes Lok Adalat awards final unless there is manifest procedural error or jurisdictional excess—neither present here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case