TARSEM SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/68874/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011953302025

Filing Number

CRM-M/101958/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/68874/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARSEM SINGH

    Adv. RUHANI CHADHA

  2. 2.TARSEM SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/68874/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to three petitioners arrested in an NDPS case involving 66 kg of opium smuggling. The court found that given the petitioners' substantial incarceration (nearly 2 years), the principle of speedy trial as a fundamental right, and that co-accused supplier received bail, bail conditions could be imposed. The court notably refrained from expressing opinion on case merits, emphasizing that prolonged detention without trial conclusion causes irreparable harm, especially under stringent special laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/68874/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/68874/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to three petitioners arrested in an NDPS case involving 66 kg of opium smuggling. The court found that given the petitioners' substantial incarceration (nearly 2 years), the principle of speedy trial as a fundamental right, and that co-accused supplier received bail, bail conditions could be imposed. The court notably refrained from expressing opinion on case merits, emphasizing that prolonged detention without trial conclusion causes irreparable harm, especially under stringent special laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case