JITENDER @ JEETU vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRA-S/3743/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011951362025

Filing Number

CRA-S/101769/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRA-S/3743/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

36.96-CRIMINAL APPEALS U/S 341 CR. P.C. (PERJURY)-CRIME AGAINST WOMEN ( 1427 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDER @ JEETU

    Adv. ADITYA SANGHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Summary: CRA-S/3743/2025 — Jitender @ Jeetu v. State of Haryana The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the bail appeal of Jitender @ Jeetu, who was arrested in a murder case under IPC Sections 302, 323, 325, 147-149, 506, 201 and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v). The court found that the appellant was implicated belatedly (78 days after the incident) through a supplementary statement, despite not being named in the original FIR or the victim's dying declaration, creating prima facie doubt about his involvement. The court noted that all three persons named by the deceased as assailants were subsequently exonerated by police, undermining the prosecution's case foundation. Released on regular bail with conditions including passport surrender and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/3743/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CRA-S/3743/2025 — Jitender @ Jeetu v. State of Haryana The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the bail appeal of Jitender @ Jeetu, who was arrested in a murder case under IPC Sections 302, 323, 325, 147-149, 506, 201 and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v). The court found that the appellant was implicated belatedly (78 days after the incident) through a supplementary statement, despite not being named in the original FIR or the victim's dying declaration, creating prima facie doubt about his involvement. The court noted that all three persons named by the deceased as assailants were subsequently exonerated by police, undermining the prosecution's case foundation. Released on regular bail with conditions including passport surrender and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case