MOHD. SOHEL ALIAS AASU ALIAS MOHAMMAD SOEL vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/67915/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011944312025

Filing Number

CRM-M/101489/2025

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/67915/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. SOHEL ALIAS AASU ALIAS MOHAMMAD SOEL

    Adv. AMIT SIWACH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/67915/2025 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Mohd. Sohel (age 20) in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 27 lakh transferred by a victim following impersonation calls. The court found that the petitioner had already undergone custody for over six months, no witnesses had been examined, nothing was recovered from him, and the trial would take considerable time. Justice H.S. Grewal held that continuous incarceration would not serve justice and ordered his release on furnishing bail/surety bonds, expressly reserving the State's right to seek bail cancellation if he commits further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/67915/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/67915/2025 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Mohd. Sohel (age 20) in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 27 lakh transferred by a victim following impersonation calls. The court found that the petitioner had already undergone custody for over six months, no witnesses had been examined, nothing was recovered from him, and the trial would take considerable time. Justice H.S. Grewal held that continuous incarceration would not serve justice and ordered his release on furnishing bail/surety bonds, expressly reserving the State's right to seek bail cancellation if he commits further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case