RAHUL CHHIKARA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/67911/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011944202025

Filing Number

CRM-M/101470/2025

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/67911/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL CHHIKARA

    Adv. NIDHI DAHIYA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Rahul Chhikara's second bail petition (CRM-M-67911-2025) in a case involving the death of Pawan, stemming from a land transaction dispute. The court found the petition unmaintainable as a successive petition lacking substantive changes in circumstances, and determined that prima facie allegations—that Chhikara pushed the victim near a well knowing he would fall—constituted serious offences under BNS Section 105, with legitimate concerns about witness intimidation and trial still at nascent stage, rendering bail unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/67911/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Rahul Chhikara's second bail petition (CRM-M-67911-2025) in a case involving the death of Pawan, stemming from a land transaction dispute. The court found the petition unmaintainable as a successive petition lacking substantive changes in circumstances, and determined that prima facie allegations—that Chhikara pushed the victim near a well knowing he would fall—constituted serious offences under BNS Section 105, with legitimate concerns about witness intimidation and trial still at nascent stage, rendering bail unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case