RANJIT SINGH ALIAS MANI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/67998/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011930552025

Filing Number

CRM-M/100859/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/67998/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT SINGH ALIAS MANI

    Adv. RANJODH SINGH SIDHU

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ranjit Singh's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 for charges under IPC Sections 399, 402, 379, and 411 (dacoity and criminal intimidation). The court rejected bail because Singh had previously absconded after being granted bail in 2019, was declared a proclaimed offender in 2023, re-arrested in February 2024, and faces similar charges in two other cases, creating flight risk concerns. The court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/67998/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ranjit Singh's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 for charges under IPC Sections 399, 402, 379, and 411 (dacoity and criminal intimidation). The court rejected bail because Singh had previously absconded after being granted bail in 2019, was declared a proclaimed offender in 2023, re-arrested in February 2024, and faces similar charges in two other cases, creating flight risk concerns. The court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case