CHILD IN CONFLICT WITH LAW NAMELY N vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRA-S/3733/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011927992025

Filing Number

CRA-S/100683/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRA-S/3733/2025

Registration Date

29-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

37.93-CRIMINAL REVISIONS U/S 167(2) CR.P.C. SEEKING REGULAR BAIL(DEFAULT BAIL)-CYBER CRIME (IT ACT) ( 1432 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHILD IN CONFLICT WITH LAW NAMELY N

    Adv. NEERAJ SANSANIWAL

  2. 2.CHILD IN CONFLICT WITH LAW NAMELY N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed a bail appeal by a 17-year-old child in conflict with law accused of murder in a case where the complainant's brother was found dead near Tigdana turn, Bhiwani. The court granted regular bail considering the appellant had spent over three years in custody, only two of 25 prosecution witnesses had been examined, trial proceedings were stayed by the High Court, and Juvenile Justice Act 2015 protections applied, with the court clarifying this decision was without prejudice to the trial's final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/3733/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed a bail appeal by a 17-year-old child in conflict with law accused of murder in a case where the complainant's brother was found dead near Tigdana turn, Bhiwani. The court granted regular bail considering the appellant had spent over three years in custody, only two of 25 prosecution witnesses had been examined, trial proceedings were stayed by the High Court, and Juvenile Justice Act 2015 protections applied, with the court clarifying this decision was without prejudice to the trial's final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case