KARAMJIT KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — FAO/6898/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC011921372025

Filing Number

FAO/74928/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

FAO/6898/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

23.6 - FAO AGST PB. STATE ELECTION COMM. ACT(M-1) ( 486 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARAMJIT KAUR

    Adv. K.S.KAHLON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Pankaj JainView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO/6898/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside an election tribunal's order that decided Karamjit Kaur's election petition without following mandatory procedural requirements—specifically, the tribunal failed to frame issues, call for respondent's response, or record evidence. The court found this constituted a "callous order" lacking application of mind and violated fundamental principles of election petition adjudication established by Supreme Court precedent. The case was remanded to the tribunal for fresh decision-making in accordance with law, with parties directed to appear on July 7, 2026, and the tribunal instructed to decide within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/6898/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO/6898/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside an election tribunal's order that decided Karamjit Kaur's election petition without following mandatory procedural requirements—specifically, the tribunal failed to frame issues, call for respondent's response, or record evidence. The court found this constituted a "callous order" lacking application of mind and violated fundamental principles of election petition adjudication established by Supreme Court precedent. The case was remanded to the tribunal for fresh decision-making in accordance with law, with parties directed to appear on July 7, 2026, and the tribunal instructed to decide within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case