JAGGA @ JAGPREET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/66551/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011906792025

Filing Number

CRM-M/99565/2025

Filing Date

21-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/66551/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Coram

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.17 - REGULAR BAIL PUNJAB (AGNST WOMEN) ( 286 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGGA @ JAGPREET SINGH

    Adv. KARANJIT SINGH

  2. 2.JAGGA SINGH ALIAS JAGPRET SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.JAGGA SINGH ALIAS JAGPRET SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Ms. Justice Kirti SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Jagga Singh (25 years old) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 346, 34, 363, and 366-A related to allegedly enticing a 17-year-old girl away on pretext of marriage. The court found that the petitioner had already undergone custody for 1 year, 6 months and 22 days, has no criminal antecedents, trial is progressing slowly (only 1 of 18 prosecution witnesses examined despite charges framed), and the key prosecution witness did not support the case. The court ruled that continued detention would not advance justice and would violate the constitutional right to personal liberty, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception." Release was ordered subject to standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness intimidation prohibitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/66551/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Jagga Singh (25 years old) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 346, 34, 363, and 366-A related to allegedly enticing a 17-year-old girl away on pretext of marriage. The court found that the petitioner had already undergone custody for 1 year, 6 months and 22 days, has no criminal antecedents, trial is progressing slowly (only 1 of 18 prosecution witnesses examined despite charges framed), and the key prosecution witness did not support the case. The court ruled that continued detention would not advance justice and would violate the constitutional right to personal liberty, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception." Release was ordered subject to standard bail conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness intimidation prohibitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case