VIKRANT SAHOTA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/66460/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011902162025

Filing Number

CRM-M/99304/2025

Filing Date

21-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/66460/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKRANT SAHOTA

    Adv. ADITYA DASSAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/66460/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Vikrant Sahota in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 109, 115(2), 117(2), and 126(2). The court found it was a mutual conflict case where guilt would be determined at trial, and since only 2 of 19 prosecution witnesses had been examined despite the petitioner's custody since January 14, 2025, further incarceration was unnecessary. Bail was granted with conditions: Rs. 50,000 FDR deposit, monthly police station appearances, non-involvement affidavits, and prohibition on witness contact/intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/66460/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/66460/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Vikrant Sahota in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 109, 115(2), 117(2), and 126(2). The court found it was a mutual conflict case where guilt would be determined at trial, and since only 2 of 19 prosecution witnesses had been examined despite the petitioner's custody since January 14, 2025, further incarceration was unnecessary. Bail was granted with conditions: Rs. 50,000 FDR deposit, monthly police station appearances, non-involvement affidavits, and prohibition on witness contact/intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case