BITTU vs STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS — CRM-M/65770/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011878342025

Filing Number

CRM-M/98199/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/65770/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BITTU

    Adv. RAJVINDER KAUR SOHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/65770/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 177 (registered at Police Station Indri, Karnal under IPC Sections 148, 149, 308, 323, 324, 427, 452, and 506) against petitioner Bittu after the parties voluntarily compromised their dispute through a compromise deed dated 14.06.2024. The court found the compromise genuine and voluntary based on a magistrate's report confirming no coercion or undue influence, with all respondents accepting the settlement. Justice H.S. Grewal held that continuing trial proceedings would serve no useful purpose and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings in accordance with established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/65770/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/65770/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed FIR No. 177 (registered at Police Station Indri, Karnal under IPC Sections 148, 149, 308, 323, 324, 427, 452, and 506) against petitioner Bittu after the parties voluntarily compromised their dispute through a compromise deed dated 14.06.2024. The court found the compromise genuine and voluntary based on a magistrate's report confirming no coercion or undue influence, with all respondents accepting the settlement. Justice H.S. Grewal held that continuing trial proceedings would serve no useful purpose and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings in accordance with established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case