RAVI ALIAS RAVINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/65668/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Nov-2025

CNR: PHHC011877482025

Filing Number

CRM-M/98133/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/65668/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI ALIAS RAVINDER SINGH

    Adv. AMIT ARORA

  2. 2.RAVI @ RAVINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.RAVI @ RAVINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ravi alias Ravinder Singh in FIR No. 162 (charges: attacking a house gate, illegal firearm discharge by co-accused, and Arms Act violation) by making absolute an interim bail order dated 11.03.2026. The court found that the petitioner had complied with the investigation requirement and cooperated fully with investigating agency, which confirmed no further custodial interrogation was needed. The bail remains conditional on continued cooperation with the investigating agency, with the State retaining liberty to move for cancellation if the petitioner fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/65668/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ravi alias Ravinder Singh in FIR No. 162 (charges: attacking a house gate, illegal firearm discharge by co-accused, and Arms Act violation) by making absolute an interim bail order dated 11.03.2026. The court found that the petitioner had complied with the investigation requirement and cooperated fully with investigating agency, which confirmed no further custodial interrogation was needed. The bail remains conditional on continued cooperation with the investigating agency, with the State retaining liberty to move for cancellation if the petitioner fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case