SURINDER KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER4 — CRM-M/65263/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Dec-2025

CNR: PHHC011868832025

Filing Number

CRM-M/97767/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/65263/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER KUMAR

    Adv. PRASHANT VASHISTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER4

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Surinder Kumar's petition to quash FIR No. 110 dated 03.06.2020 (registered under Sections 406/420 IPC read with Section 24 Immigration Act) and all consequent proceedings, after the parties submitted that the underlying monetary dispute had been voluntarily compromised on 28.10.2025 with societal intervention. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was genuine and without coercion, and all counsel agreed, making further trial proceedings serve no useful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/65263/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Surinder Kumar's petition to quash FIR No. 110 dated 03.06.2020 (registered under Sections 406/420 IPC read with Section 24 Immigration Act) and all consequent proceedings, after the parties submitted that the underlying monetary dispute had been voluntarily compromised on 28.10.2025 with societal intervention. The Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise was genuine and without coercion, and all counsel agreed, making further trial proceedings serve no useful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case