ASHISH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/65321/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Nov-2025

CNR: PHHC011865192025

Filing Number

CRM-M/97486/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/65321/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR KHUNGER

  2. 2.ASHISH @ CHHOTU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ashish, accused of attacking and killing Manjeet Singh with a danda in August 2024. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that no specific injury was attributed to him in the FIR and that a statement recorded by the deceased before his death was missing from the investigation, creating reasonable doubt. Having spent 18+ months in custody with trial likely prolonged, the court concluded continued detention would not serve justice, applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/65321/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ashish, accused of attacking and killing Manjeet Singh with a danda in August 2024. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that no specific injury was attributed to him in the FIR and that a statement recorded by the deceased before his death was missing from the investigation, creating reasonable doubt. Having spent 18+ months in custody with trial likely prolonged, the court concluded continued detention would not serve justice, applying the principle that bail is the rule and detention the exception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case