SAHIRAM SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CWP/33778/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011831572025
Filing Number
CWP/71327/2025
Filing Date
06-Nov-2025
Registration No
CWP/33778/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Coram
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.63 - CASES RELATING TO ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATION ( 756 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAHIRAM SHARMA AND ANOTHER
Adv. PAVITRA
-
2.SAHIRAM SHARMA AND ANOTHER
-
3.JANA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
-
3.Chairman, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
-
4.Superintending Engineer, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Fatehabad
-
5.XEN Division Fatehabad, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Fatehabad
-
6.Sub Divisional Engineer Bhattu Kalan, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
-
7.Chief Engineer (OP), Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
-
8.Station House Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/33778/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Sahiram Sharma and another against the State of Haryana and others as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the case with liberty to refile it with better and more detailed particulars. All pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/33778/2025
Case Summary: CWP/33778/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition filed by Sahiram Sharma and another against the State of Haryana and others as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the case with liberty to refile it with better and more detailed particulars. All pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts