DAVINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER vs THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS — CWP/33774/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011826502025
e-Filing Number
10-11-2025
Filing Number
CWP/71172/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
CWP/33774/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Bench Type
Single
Category
18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DAVINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER
Adv. NAVRAJ SINGH MAHAL
-
2.Davinder Singh and Another
-
3.Manjit Kaur
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
-
2.The Financial Commissioner and others
-
3.The Commissioner
-
4.The SDM cum Collector
-
5.Tehsildar
-
6.Raj Singh alias Balraj Singh
-
7.Ranjit Singh
-
8.Jagdish Singh
-
9.Pritpal Singh
-
10.Parkash Singh
-
11.Jora Singh
-
12.Gurcharan Singh
-
13.Gurmail Singh
-
14.Chhehbar Singh
-
15.Balwant Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition (CWP-33774-2025) filed by Davinder Singh and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought to set aside multiple administrative orders dated between 2015-2025 from various revenue officials, but failed to appear and pursue the case despite repeated adjournments. Justice Harsh Bunger found the petitioners uninterested in continuing the matter and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/33774/2025
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition (CWP-33774-2025) filed by Davinder Singh and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought to set aside multiple administrative orders dated between 2015-2025 from various revenue officials, but failed to appear and pursue the case despite repeated adjournments. Justice Harsh Bunger found the petitioners uninterested in continuing the matter and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts