DAVINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER vs THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS — CWP/33774/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC011826502025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

10th December 2025

e-Filing Number

10-11-2025

Filing Number

CWP/71172/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

CWP/33774/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Burn Company and Indian Standard Wagon Company (Nationalisation) Act

Petitioner(s)

DAVINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER

Adv. NAVRAJ SINGH MAHAL

Davinder Singh and Another

Manjit Kaur

Respondent(s)

THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

The Financial Commissioner and others

The Commissioner

The SDM cum Collector

Tehsildar

Raj Singh alias Balraj Singh

Ranjit Singh

Jagdish Singh

Pritpal Singh

Parkash Singh

Jora Singh

Gurcharan Singh

Gurmail Singh

Chhehbar Singh

Balwant Singh

Orders

11-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition (CWP-33774-2025) filed by Davinder Singh and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought to set aside multiple administrative orders dated between 2015-2025 from various revenue officials, but failed to appear and pursue the case despite repeated adjournments. Justice Harsh Bunger found the petitioners uninterested in continuing the matter and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition (CWP-33774-2025) filed by Davinder Singh and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought to set aside multiple administrative orders dated between 2015-2025 from various revenue officials, but failed to appear and pursue the case despite repeated adjournments. Justice Harsh Bunger found the petitioners uninterested in continuing the matter and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case