KARUNA vs THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/35067/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Dec-2024

CNR: PHHC011802862024

e-Filing Number

18-12-2024

Filing Number

CWP/75019/2024

Filing Date

18-Dec-2024

Registration No

CWP/35067/2024

Registration Date

19-Dec-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.11 - WRIT (RTI) ( 737 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARUNA

    Adv. SUBE S KAUSHIK

  2. 2.The State Information Commission of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.The State Information Commission of Haryana and others

  3. 3.The Director General Higher Education Haryana

  4. 4.Sh M L Singla Associate Professor in Commerce

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/35067/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside a Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed by the State Information Commission on petitioner Karuna (SPIO) for allegedly failing to furnish complete RTI information. The court found that the petitioner had supplied all requested information through multiple submissions and the respondent (an Associate Professor with a service dispute) later undertook to withdraw all RTI applications, indicating he received the required information. The court concluded the dispute arose from service-related issues rather than non-compliance with RTI obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/35067/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/35067/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside a Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed by the State Information Commission on petitioner Karuna (SPIO) for allegedly failing to furnish complete RTI information. The court found that the petitioner had supplied all requested information through multiple submissions and the respondent (an Associate Professor with a service dispute) later undertook to withdraw all RTI applications, indicating he received the required information. The court concluded the dispute arose from service-related issues rather than non-compliance with RTI obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case